The job of the executive

When Stanley "Tookie" Williams was executed by the State of California a couple of weeks ago there were the expected protests. One such came from the leadership of the city of Graz, Austria, hometown of California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger. Politicians in the city who oppose the death penalty launched a petition drive to remove Schwarzenegger's name from the city's sports stadium. In response, the Governor sent a letter to the city's mayor, "telling him that he is rescinding the city's right to use his name, effective immediately." In addition, he is returning the city's ring of honor that he received in 1999.

This situation nicely illustrates a point which a lot of people don't understand about how the different branches of government work. To begin, here are a couple of excerpts of the above-linked article with additional emphasis added by yours truly:

Death penalty opponents argued the prisoner's authoring nine children's books detailing the dangers of gang life meant he deserved to have his sentence commuted to life in prison. Schwarzenegger said he found no legal grounds for changing the sentence, particularly since Williams did not show any remorse for the killings.

...

"I rejected the clemency plea of a rightfully condemned four-time murderer after thorough review and as a result, he was executed according to the laws of the state," Schwarzenegger wrote.

Article 5, Section 8, subsection a of the California State Constitution provides the Governor's power to affect criminal sentences:

Subject to application procedures provided by statute, the Governor, on conditions the Governor deems proper, may grant a reprieve, pardon, and commutation, after sentence, except in case of impeachment. The Governor shall report to the Legislature each reprieve, pardon, and commutation granted, stating the pertinent facts and the reasons for granting it. The Governor may not grant a pardon or commutation to a person twice convicted of a felony except on recommendation of the Supreme Court, 4 judges concurring.

Just as the President is the chief executive of the Federal Government, the Governor is the chief executive of the State Government. Their job is to implement the law, not create or negate it. The people of California, as represented by the state legislature, have decided that certain crimes merit the ultimate sanction. Williams was convicted of such a crime, the sentence was handed down, and it was carried out. People who oppose the death penalty doubtless want the Governor to commute every death sentence that comes to him for review. He theoretically has the power to do this, but from the quotes above it's clear that he understands that doing so would be defying the will of the people and an abuse of power. He understands that it would be de facto outlawing the death penalty and, regardless of his personal opinion of whether or not the death penalty should be legal, it is not his place to override the legislature.

Driving the economy into the ground

This chart shows just how disastrous the Bush tax policy over the last couple of years has been to the economy and to federal government tax revenue. (Hat tip Acidman.)

All sarcasm aside, this shows that you really can grow federal tax revenue with tax cuts, at least as long as they're the right ones and work to stimulate the economy. As Rob notes, however, there's still a problem with runaway federal spending. Note that I'm not talking about what we're spending on the war, which is one of the few things that the federal government is actually authorized to do under the Constitution. It's time for the President and the Republican Congress to remember what it's like to be fiscal conservatives.

On the execution of Stanley "Tookie" Williams

Early this morning, the execution of Stanley Williams, convicted of four counts of first-degree murder, was carried out by the State of California. I will not here argue for or against the use of the death penalty. Suffice it to say that it is legal in California and that the process was carried out according to the law.

When the state, through the instrument of the criminal justice system, determines that a human being has committed a crime which warrants the ultimate sanction, it is not a time to rejoice or celebrate. It is instead a most solemn occasion. It leads us to think about redemption, retribution, justice, and a host of other concepts that we often take for granted in our lives. It's one thing for a person to murder another. That person is acting on his own and must take responsibility for his actions. But when a criminal is executed, it is society as a whole that is taking this action. In a sense, we are all doing it since we live in a nation where the power ultimately resides in the people who directly through the initiative and referendum processes, or indirectly through electing legislators, determine the laws under which we live.

Many have said that Williams deserved to have his sentence commuted to life in prison because he had done positive works since his conviction. He had written children's books and written and spoke against the dangers of gangs and gang violence. However, one of the principles of our justice system, regardless of how consistently it is applied in practice, is that of equal justice under the law. If a person can avoid the death penalty through performing good works and/or showing believable remorse between the time of his conviction and the scheduled date of his execution, then it should be made a part of the law so that everyone who is sentenced to die can have this opportunity. It should be applied objectively not subjectively.

Ultimately it comes down to the difference between punishment/reformation and redemption. Rather than attempt to differentiate the two myself I will instead point you toward a very good essay over at From the Grand Stand contrasting the two and how they apply to death penalty cases. (Hat tip to Kim)

Building the HTPC, part IV

It's done. I actually stayed up until 4:00 am Saturday morning configuring it. I placed it on the rack and connected it to the tv and the amplifier and it just worked. At first I disconnected the coax that connects the wall socket and the cable tuner box and from the back of the box and connected it to the computer. This allowed the computer's tuner to receive channels up to 99 but none of the digital channels. Yesterday I put it back the way it was and then used three cables with RCA connectors to connect the left and right audio outputs and the composite video output on the cable box to the corresponding jacks on the computer's tuner card. The Media Center remote came with an IR emitter (what I earlier referred to as an IR Blaster) which allows the computer to control the cable box. I'll eventually end up splitting the coax from the wall so that one side will connect directly to the computer, thus allowing it to record two analog channels, or one analog and one digital, at the same time, or allow me to watch one while it records the other.

There was one other snag I encountered while setting up the system. Since I'm using SATA drives instead of IDE, the Windows installer wasn't able to work with those drives without using a separate driver. Fortunately, it has the ability to load such a driver during installation but it requires that the driver be on a floppy disk. I still have a floppy drive so I was able to get past it. Once Windows was installed, the floppy drive was no longer necessary.

I'm using a program called LCD Smartie to drive the VFD on the front of the case. It's amazingly flexible and I've just barely started playing with its capabilities. One thing it can do is interface with Motherboard Monitor which is what I'm using to monitor the temperature of the computer. So far it doesn't appear to be running much, if any, hotter than it was when I was using it as my desktop system.

There are a few more tweaks I'll probably perform but as of now the system is basically done and in place. It has replaced my DVD player which I'll probably move to the bedroom and connect to the tv there. I dunno how often we'll use it, though.

If anyone out there is planning on building their own home theater PC, especially if you are planning on using Windows Media Center Edition as your OS, a very good resource is The Green Button, named after the large green button on the Media Center remote control that launches the Media Center software.

Building the HTPC, part III

It's up and running, and I'm using it to make this post. Right now it's sitting on my dining room table with the mouse, keyboard, and monitor from my regular computer hooked up to it. The next step is to take it over to the rack by the tv and hook it up there. I may have to connect the monitor to it if the system doesn't automatically detect that it's connected via S-video to the television and automatically route the display accordingly. Either way I should be able to configure Windows and the Media Center software to use the tv for the primary display.

I did run into one snag while putting it all together. The power supply has two fans, one that sucks air into the power supply from within the case, and one that blows air out the back. Both fans have a grill over them, or at least they used to. The Zalman cpu cooler's heatsink was just wide enough that it was up against the internal fan grill and I couldn't mount it without seriously bending the fins. I figured I'd go ahead and put the old cooler back on, but then decided to see what happened if I removed that grill. Once it was removed, everything just barely fit. It shouldn't be a problem as long as I don't stick my fingers in the fan while it's running. Somehow, I don't foresee myself doing that.

Other than that, everything fit although it's pretty tight in a couple of places. I'll need to watch the system temperature to make sure that there's adequate airflow. The case has the capacity for an additional 80mm fan mounted on the bottom so I can put one there if I decide it needs additional air circulation.

The AP steps in it yet again

Via The GeekWithA.45, we see yet another example of a "reporter" writing a "story" that is nothing but falsifications and regurgitation of anti-gun propaganda. Under the pretense of researching a "business feature" on Barrett Rifles, Rose French came to the company and was able to interview Ronnie Barrett and others. However, if you read the article, you will see that it isn't remotely a "business feature." SayUncle posts, with permission, the content of an email sent to the AP's Nashville bureau by Dan Goodwin, Media Relations Manager for Barrett Rifles. He also links to a scathing response by Michael Marks of the Fifty Caliber Institute.

The AP has since published a "correction" which does admit and correct inaccuracies in the original article. However, nothing is said about Ms. French misrepresenting herself to Barrett Rifles.

Building the HTPC, part II

After a bit of a snafu, I picked up the case yesterday evening on the way home from work. I bought it from a local computer shop but, when I went in a few days ago, they didn't have any in the store. However, they did have a few in the warehouse so they said they'd have one sent to the store. The next day, which was the day before yesterday, I went in to pick it up but it turns out that it was the wrong one. The model I wanted comes in two variants. One has a vacuum flourescent display (VFD) while the other does not. Both come in the same box which has graphics and text for each on opposite sides. A sticker on the box denotes which one is actually inside. The folks at the warehouse apparently didn't realize this and sent the LC03 without the VFD.

Yesterday they got the correct unit in and I picked it up. I now have everything I need. I plan to assemble the machine this weekend.