A deplorable act

I agree with everything in the following press release from the Citizens' Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms:

CCRKBA DEPLORES AZ SHOOTING,
SUBSEQUENT EXPLOITATION

BELLEVUE, WA – The Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms is condemning Saturday’s attempted assassination of Arizona Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords and the murders of six people including a federal judge and a 9-year-old child, for which a 22-year-old Tucson man is now facing charges.

“Our sincere sympathy and sorrow goes to the victims of this heinous crime, and their families, who are in our thoughts and prayers,” said CCRKBA Chairman Alan M. Gottlieb. “This was a despicable act of cowardice, and we believe the full force of law should be used against the individual responsible.

“And speaking of despicable,” he continued, “we find it unconscionable that the gun prohibition lobby wasted no time at all in its attempt to exploit this hideous attack in an effort to further its political agenda. When will these people stop dancing in the blood of crime victims in an attempt to resuscitate their relevance?”

Gottlieb was especially critical of attempts by at least two different organizations to link an out-of-context remark made in 2009 by the National Rifle Association’s Wayne LaPierre to this crime. He called it a “shameless demonstration of the depths to which the anti-gun-rights lobby will stoop in an attempt to discredit gun rights organizations.

“We notice,” he said, “that little has been said about the courageous armed citizen, Joe Zamudio, who helped physically subdue the gunman. Despite Mr. Zamudio’s disclosure during interviews with CNN and Fox News that he was armed, the press appears to be largely ignoring this detail.

“The gun apparently used by the suspect, Jared Loughner, was quickly traced to a legal sale at a Tucson-area sporting goods store in November,” he added. “The speed by which that firearm was traced belies claims that police agencies are hindered by current statute that prohibits political exploitation of firearm trace data.

“A horrible crime has been committed, and our nation is stunned,” Gottlieb concluded. “But until this investigation is completed, it is disgusting that gun prohibitionists would rush to the nearest microphone, demanding that we need more laws, while trying to link firearms rights advocates to this tragedy.”

There is hope

In Egypt, something wonderful happened:

Egypt’s majority Muslim population stuck to its word Thursday night. What had been a promise of solidarity to the weary Coptic community, was honoured, when thousands of Muslims showed up at Coptic Christmas eve mass services in churches around the country and at candle light vigils held outside.

From the well-known to the unknown, Muslims had offered their bodies as “human shields” for last night’s mass, making a pledge to collectively fight the threat of Islamic militants and towards an Egypt free from sectarian strife.

“We either live together, or we die together,” was the sloganeering genius of Mohamed El-Sawy, a Muslim arts tycoon whose cultural centre distributed flyers at churches in Cairo Thursday night, and who has been credited with first floating the “human shield” idea.

Among those shields were movie stars Adel Imam and Yousra, popular preacher Amr Khaled, the two sons of President Hosni Mubarak, and thousands of citizens who have said they consider the attack one on Egypt as a whole.

“This is not about us and them,” said Dalia Mustafa, a student who attended mass at Virgin Mary Church on Maraashly. “We are one. This was an attack on Egypt as a whole, and I am standing with the Copts because the only way things will change in this country is if we come together.”

Got it in one

The quote of the day, from this article by John Hayward:

The assertion that some citizens have an unbreakable, arbitrary responsibility to provide sustenance for others is inherently hostile to the concept of liberty.  You are not “free” when the collective demands of favored citizens can place unlimited demands on the fruit of your labor.  A nation is not “free” when any class of its citizens faces such demands, no matter how badly outnumbered or politically unpopular they might be.

Go read it all.

Justice Breyer thinks banning guns is allowed under the Second Amendment

He's really stretching for this one:

If you look at the values and the historical record, you will see that the Founding Fathers never intended guns to go unregulated, Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer contended Sunday.

Appearing on "Fox News Sunday," Breyer said history stands with the dissenters in the court's decision to overturn a Washington, D.C., handgun ban in the 2008 case "D.C. v. Heller." 

Breyer wrote the dissent and was joined by Justices John Paul Stevens, David H. Souter and Ruth Bader Ginsburg. He said historians would side with him in the case because they have concluded that Founding Father James Madison was more worried that the Constitution may not be ratified than he was about granting individuals the right to bear arms.

To Justice Breyer I would say two things:  First, regardless of what Madison actually thought, he was not the only founder and his is not the only opinion to value.   Second, even if you're right, you cannot reasonably extrapolate that Madison, let alone all of the Founders, would support an outright ban on personal firearms as effectively existed in Washington DC prior to the Heller ruling.

He goes on:

"If you're interested in history, and in this one history was important, then I think you do have to pay attention to the story," Breyer said. "If that was his motive historically, the dissenters were right. And I think more of the historians were with us."

That being the case, and particularly since the Founding Fathers did not foresee how modern day would change individual behavior, government bodies can impose regulations on guns, Breyer concluded.

Do you also agree, then, that "since the Founding Fathers did not forsee how modern day would change individual behavior" that government bodies can impose regulations on speech?  Of course not.  Some would say that this analogy is not valid, but throughout history governments have decreed that certain speech is just as dangerous as a gun.  Of course, first they took away the guns, then they took away the right to speech.  There's a lesson there, methinks.

Quote of the day

Via the Patriot Post.

"More troubling than WikiLeaks' latest revelation of US secrets ... is the Obama administration's weak, wrong-headed and erratic response. Unfortunately, the administration has acted consistently with its demonstrated unwillingness to assert and defend US interests across a wide range of threats, such as Iran and North Korea, which, ironically, the leaked cables amply document. ... His secretary of state does not comprehend that America is the subject of the attack, his department of defense is not interested in defending us, and the president himself seems utterly indifferent to the whole affair. All of this underscores the real problem. It is not WikiLeaks that ultimately imperils our national security, but the failing Obama administration, which ignores the nature and extent of threats we face, and which is too often unwilling to act to thwart them." --former UN ambassador John Bolton

A new record

It's been pretty cold lately here in the Seattle area.

As expected, the temperature dropped to 14 degrees early Wednesday at Sea-Tac Airport, breaking the old record of 16 from 1985.

KING 5 Meteorologist Rich Marriott said temperatures dipped to 9 degrees in Lynnwood, 7 degrees in Parkland and -8 in Ellensberg. Other reported temperatures included Bellingham 18, Tacoma 13, Olympia 16, Vancouver 19, Yakima -11, Moses Lake -17, Spokane -6, Pullman -1.

Al Gore, call your office, if you're willing to stick your head up at all.

TSA Humor

Ah, you *think* they're only jokes....

Via the Patriot Post.

Transportation Security Administration

Submitted

Submitted

Obamacare is so awesome...

that only 111 companies and other organizations have been issued waivers.  So far.  I'm sure the number will increase, but that doesn't mean Obamacare isn't everything Democrats have told us it is, right?

Unsurprisingly, many unions such as SEIU are on that list.

Also unsurprisingly, this information wasn't made readily available.  After all, what we the people don't know won't hurt them....

Quote of the day

Via the Patriot Post.

"While we are constantly being schooled in how insensitive we are to Muslims and how we should be bowing to the idea of a Ground Zero mega-mosque, or are being admonished for not embracing the Sharia, the state of wartime siege continues unabated. The Muslim world is under no such mandate to reach out or reciprocate. They only have to demand, and the West apologizes. ... We live in a constant state of low-grade war. And with each new Muslim attack, we lose a right. We lose a freedom. We have to adhere to some new restriction or loss of privacy. ... The general silence from the mainstream media and our governing officials on last weekend's wholesale slaughter of Christians praying in a Church is indicative of how decayed, empty, and morally inverted our leaders and media have become. The slaughter of the churchgoers in Baghdad was a crime against humanity. And there are thousands of stories of Islamic slaughter, but the lambs remain silent. Have we become so inured to Islamic jihad that human life is cheap to us as well?" --columnist Pamela Geller

Rachel Maddow gets pwned

After Keith Olbermann was suspended (as it turns out, for only two days) for making undisclosed campaign contributions in violation of his employer's policy, Rachel Maddow leapt to his defense with a classic example of tu quoque. Except that it really wasn't. The single example she provided was not that of a Fox News host providing a campaign contribution but rather a clip where a Republican candidate who was a guest on Sean Hannity's show provides the URL for his website and notes that donations can be made:

People can come on our website at KasichforOhio.com, Sunday night at 6:30 we're going to talk about the damage the Obama agenda has done to us and if you have any extra nickels or dimes, please send it our way. KasichforOhio.com.

The implication is that this is equivalent to Hannity making a contribution to Kasich's campaign but it's not.

Still, Maddow thinks this one incident proves that Fox is a political organization whereas MSNBC is not. I wonder just how hard it is for her to reach such a high level of hypocrisy. I wonder if, after seeing the below video, she will provide a "correction" to her statement. Can't say as I'm going to hold my breath waiting for it.



This paragraph from the above linked blog post provides a good summation:

Rachel Maddow’s holier-than-thou smugness is best encapsulated in her claim that on Fox News, hosts allow fundraising for Republican candidates on the air. Ergo Fox is political, MSNBC isn’t. Ms Maddow’s examples of this happening on FNC? A grand total of: one. John Kasich, appearing on Hannity, gave out his website URL and encouraged donations. It’s the only example Maddow gave because it’s the one Media Matters cited. That’s called ‘journalism’.

There may have been a time when Rachel Maddow had journalistic integrity. If so, it's long gone. Watch her for her opinions if you want, but if you trust her to tell the complete truth, you are a fool.

Not really funny

The Patriot Post send the following image in this week's humor email. The problem is, it's not really funny. It's more a serious commentary on religious tolerance. You know those "coexist" stickers you see on many cars, especially in cities like Seattle and San Francisco, the ones where the letters are actually the symbols of various religions and movements? This image does a pretty good job I think of explaining just why such coexistence is currently problematic. Comments?

Rights vs. obligations

The First Amendment guarantees my freedom of speech. However, it does not impose an obligation on anyone to facilitate that speech, nor does it allow me to impose my opinions upon others if they don't want to hear it. In short, if I want to say something, I should get my own damn soap box, namely this blog, and I can't force you to read it.

The so-called Reverend Phelps and his odious Westboro Baptist Church have been pushing the boundaries of this division, and the argument can be made that they have crossed the line. A lawsuit is currently in progress to determine whether or not they have done so. In the meantime, a small town in Missouri have come up with their own solution to this problem.

Hundreds of residents in Weston, Mo. -- as well as people as far away as California and Australia -- rallied in support of Sgt. First Class C.J. Sadell, who died from injuries suffered during a surprise attack in Afghanistan.

The residents sought to block Fred Phelps, leader of the Westboro Baptist Church in Topeka, Kan., and his followers from picketing Sadell’s funeral, according to the station

.
And how did they accomplish it?

"We got everybody here early so we could take up all the parking spots," Rebecca Rooney of Weston, Mo., told Fox4kc.com. "We did that so Mr. Phelps wouldn't have a contingency that was really close."

"I'm glad they left, but I'm sad they came," she said.

Very clever, and quite legal. Nicely done.

How the mighty has fallen

Oh California, you were once the envy of the nation. Now, you're just a laughingstock. I really can't argue with anything said here:

It’s the proverbial morning after and with votes counted, California has won the Dumbest State Award in a historic landslide of monstrous proportions.

All Californians can now see Greece from their bedroom windows. No need to even go to the backyards and crane their little necks.

The author brings up something that has been on my mind since yesterday evening:

...if they keep it up they’re going to face a loud demand from the other 49 for their statehood and immediate, irreversible secession by force.

To my knowledge, there is no provision in the Constitution that allows the United States to kick a state out of the union so I don't think it's currently possible for that to happen. But given that California is almost certainly going to end up completely bankrupt, and will demand the rest of the nation bail out its collective ass, it may be time for an amendment adding such a provision. After yesterday, it could very well pass the House, but probably not the Senate. But that's not the only way an amendment can be proposed. I think it's high time for a good old fashioned Constitutional Convention.

Goodnight America

Well it went about as well as I thought it would. Republicans will have a majority in the House and the Democrats' majority in the Senate has been significantly reduced. Also, do not overlook the importance of Republican gains in governorships and state legislatures which have occurred.

And now it's time to get some sleep. It would be nice if tomorrow I wake up to the news that Patty Murray is coming home. But I'll just have to wait and see how it goes.

How about those initiatives?

Back to the state of Washington for some news on the initiatives that were on the ballot.

First, the good news:

I-1053, which restores the requirements to raise taxes initially imposed by I-960 three years ago, is passing by a large margin. This isn't surprising. We meant it when we passed 960; now the legislature has been told this in no uncertain terms.

I-1098, the income tax on top earners, is going down to a flaming defeat. Let's hope this monster never raises its head again. I wouldn't be surprised if the legislature tries to impose one within the next couple of years, however.

I-1107, which rolls back new taxes on certain food items, is winning handily. I don't care that these items are things like candy and gum, it's the principle of the thing. Good job.

I-1105, one of the initiatives that would privatize liquor sales, is being defeated handily. I ended up voting against this one as I preferred the other initiative that addressed getting the state out of the liquor business.

The not so good news:

I-1082, which would have privatized industrial insurance (i.e. workers' comp), is going down to defeat. I wasn't sure at the time I posted my recommendations but I ended up voting for it.

I-1100, my preferred initiative for privatizing liquor sales, is currently losing but not by much. Currently enough votes from King County, where the initiative was leading, remain to be counted that it could still pass.

Hey Phil, do you care about the Constitution now?

Phil Hare, soon to be former Representative from Illinois, is the one who once said he didn't care about the Constitution.

I bet he's really regretting his words now.

Will they steal it from Dino a third time?

The Senate race between Democrat Senator Patty Murray and Republican challenger Dino Rossi is still too close to call given that Washington State votes mostly by mail. This one could drag on for several days, maybe even longer. Depending on the outcome of other Senate races throughout the country, control of the Senate may end up depending on how this one turns out. Even if there's no doubt that Democrats will retain a majority, it will be close enough to even that one seat will still make a big difference.

I believe Dino Rossi had the 2004 gubernatorial election flat out stolen by the Democrats. When he lost again in 2008 it was by a larger margin though I suspect there was still fraud. I can't say whether it made the difference that time but I'm certainly not ruling it out completely.

Given the importance of this election and this particular race, I expect Democrats to pull out all the stops in an effort to ensure Murray returns to the Senate. Let's hope that any shenanigans that do take place are uncovered in a timely manner.

Really, California?

It looks like California is sending Governor Moonbeam back to the executive mansion. Unbelievable. My lovely wife informs me that he was effectively running on the statement that, when he was governor, California had a balanced budget. That may be but the state legislature would have been most responsible for that.

Seven beautiful words...

Fox News is now projecting that Republicans will gain control of the House of Representatives and gain about 60 seats. We figured this would happen but it's now become more and more likely that soon we'll hear those seven beautiful words....

Former Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi.

I get goose bumps just typing it.

Now the fun really begins

It's after 5:00 here on the West Coast which means polls in the East are closed or will close soon.

The one race I'll note at this time is the Senate race in Connecticut between Democrat Richard Blumenthal, who exaggerated his military service, and Republican Linda McMahon who, along with her husband, built a wildly successful business. Fox News is projecting Blumenthal to be the winner but the number of votes counted is still a small percentage of the total. I'm going to wait and see on this one.